Can you commit arson on a building that you own?

The reasoning behind the correct answer centers on the definition of arson and the legal principles surrounding it. Arson is generally defined as the willful and malicious burning or exploding of property, regardless of ownership. The key element that establishes liability for arson is the act of setting fire to property with intent to cause damage, rather than who owns the property.

Ownership does not provide immunity from arson charges. A person can be held liable for committing arson even if they own the property that is burned. So, in this scenario, possession—meaning control over the property at the time of the act—determines liability rather than ownership. Therefore, someone can commit arson on a building they own if it meets the other elements of the offense.

This understanding dismisses the notions in the other choices. For example, the idea that ownership prevents arson charges is fundamentally misaligned with how the law treats such acts. Similarly, stipulations regarding the building being mortgaged or empty are not relevant in determining whether arson was committed; it is the act itself that establishes the crime.