For liability in arson, what must an individual do to meet the reckless disregard standard?

In the context of arson liability, to meet the reckless disregard standard, an individual must engage in behavior that demonstrates a conscious disregard of a substantial and unjustifiable risk. The correct choice, which indicates failing to stop a fire that was easy to control, aligns with this standard.

When a person has the ability to stop or control a fire and chooses not to do so, this reflects a conscious decision to ignore a clear danger, thereby fulfilling the criteria for recklessness. The person knows or should know that their inaction can lead to significant harm, such as damage to property or endangerment to life, which is key to establishing reckless behavior in arson cases.

In contrast, starting a fire intentionally signifies a specific intent to cause damage, which is a different standard of liability and does not relate to recklessness. Possessing the building that is burned does not directly pertain to the individual's attitude or awareness of the risks involved with the fire. Lastly, lacking awareness of fire risks is not a valid defense for reckless disregard; the law typically requires that the individual at least be conscious of the risks to evaluate their actions appropriately. Thus, the failure to control an easily manageable fire exemplifies the reckless disregard standard that is crucial for addressing liability in ar