In the context of joint and several liability, what does it mean for defendants A and B to be allocated fault percentages?

In the context of joint and several liability, when defendants A and B are allocated fault percentages, it means that each defendant can be held responsible for the total amount of damages, allowing the plaintiff to recover the full damages from either party. This principle is particularly important as it enables a plaintiff to seek the entire amount of the judgment from any one of the jointly liable defendants, regardless of their respective degrees of fault.

For instance, if a court finds that A is 30% at fault and B is 70% at fault, the plaintiff could pursue the entire amount of damages from A or B. If one defendant pays the full amount, that party can then seek contribution from the other defendant based on their fault percentage. This framework ensures that the plaintiff does not bear the risk of a defendant being unable to pay their share since the law allows for the entirety of the damages to be collected from a single defendant if necessary.

Other options do not accurately represent the implications of allocating fault percentages in a joint and several liability scenario. For example, while equality in payment may seem appealing, joint and several liability does not require that defendants pay equally; their financial responsibility is based on their respective degrees of fault. Similarly, the allocation of fault percentages does not limit the