What prevails when a survey contradicts a recorded plat?

When a survey contradicts a recorded plat, the survey on the ground typically takes precedence. This principle is grounded in property law, where actual measurements and on-the-ground conditions are considered more reliable than an official record that may contain errors or inaccuracies.

Land surveys are conducted to ascertain the true boundaries of a property based on physical markers and measurements, whereas recorded plats serve as a legal description of the property but may not accurately reflect the actual situation on the ground due to errors in the platting process, changes over time, or other factors. Courts generally prioritize the physical evidence of property boundaries determined through a survey, as it reflects the real-world situation rather than relying solely on potentially flawed documentation.

This hierarchy of importance means that if a conflict arises between the two, the actual survey will be viewed as a more trustworthy source of information regarding property lines, giving it precedence in determining boundaries and ownership rights.