What provides the strongest argument for a state legislature giving state funds exclusively to all-white schools?

The strongest argument for a state legislature providing state funds exclusively to all-white schools would be based on the concept of state sovereignty, although the specific reference to "10 A" is unclear in its context. Generally, state sovereignty refers to the authority of a state to govern itself and make decisions regarding its education system without federal interference, especially in the context of historical cases regarding race and education.

In this context, the argument might hinge on the idea that the state has the right to allocate resources as it sees fit based on its own policies and governance. In the past, some states defended their decisions regarding educational funding with assertions of state rights, contending that the federal government should not impose its views or regulations on their local matters.

Other options do not align as strongly with this rationale. For instance, arguments based on equal funding laws or the support of federal law would likely contradict the notion of excluding schools based on race, as federal mandates typically promote equal access to education for all racial groups. Thus, invoking state sovereignty presents the most compelling reasoning for such legislative choices while mitigating concerns regarding federal mandates or equal rights.